Abstract
This study examines the dynamics of Sunni–Shiʿi relations in Singapore, focusing on the Ismaili and Imami Shiʿi communities within a political culture that emphasizes religious harmony and pluralism. It challenges the assumption that Sunni–Shiʿi differences are inherently irreconcilable by situating sectarian relations within Singapore’s specific socio-political context. The research employs a qualitative descriptive-comparative approach. Primary data were collected through semi-structured interviews with religious leaders, academics, administrators of inter-madhhab dialogue institutions, and representatives of both Sunni and Shiʿi communities. Secondary data were gathered through a comprehensive review of scholarly publications, books, policy documents, and civil society reports addressing Sunni–Shiʿi relations. Data were analyzed thematically to identify patterns and variations in intra-faith harmony practices, with source triangulation applied to ensure validity. The findings indicate that Sunni–Shiʿi relations in Singapore have historically been peaceful within the country’s secular-pluralistic political framework. The Ismaili community, as the oldest Shiʿi group, adapted during Singapore’s nation-building phase, while the Imami community, which expanded after the Iranian Revolution, has operated within an already established legal and cultural framework of religious harmony. Episodes of tension are largely attributable to the intrusion of external political sentiments, particularly those linked to Middle Eastern conflicts, rather than domestic factors. These findings suggest that intra-faith harmony is strongly shaped by national institutional and political contexts. In a system that safeguards religious freedom and promotes interreligious harmony, sectarian differences can be constructively managed within a plural society.
Bibliography
Aljuneid, S. M. K. (2009). Sustaining Islamic activism in secular environments: The Muhammadiyah movement in Singapore (Asia Research Institute Working Paper No. 120). Asia Research Institute.
Anjuman-E-Burhani, Singapore. (n.d.). Committees. Singjamaat. http://singjamaat.org/committees/anjuman-e-burhani
Anjuman-E-Burhani, Singapore. (n.d.). History. Singjamaat. http://singjamaat.org/about-us/masjid-history
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, U.S. Department of State. (2016). International religious freedom report for 2013. U.S. Department of State.
Cap. 290. (1985). Sedition Act (Revised ed.). Singapore Statutes.
Cap. 338. (1998). Undesirable Publications Act (Revised ed.). Singapore Statutes.
Himpunan Belia Islam. (2010). Himpunan Belia Islam. http://www.hbi.org.sg/home/index.php
Imam Reza Network. (2016). Imam Reza Network. http://www.imamreza.net/eng/imamreza.php?id=9440
Ipscommons.sg. (2015). From tolerance to acceptance: Racial and religious harmony in Singapore. http://www.ipscommons.sg/from-tolerance-to-acceptance-racial-and-religious-harmony-in-singapore/
Lee, K. Y. (1964, July 29). Religious freedom in Singapore after Malaysia. Singapore Parliamentary Debates, 21, col. 261.
Maintenance of Religious Harmony. (1989). Cmd. 21 of 1989. Government of Singapore.
Marcinkowski, C. (2006). Facets of Shiʿite Islam in contemporary Southeast Asia (II): Malaysia and Singapore (RSIS Working Paper No. 121). S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/rsis-pubs/WP121.pdf
Musa, M. F. (n.d.). Malaysian Shiʿites’ lonely struggle. World Public Forum: Dialogue of Civilizations. http://wpfdc.org/images/docs/Mohd_Faizal_Musa_The_Malaysian_Shiites_Lonely_Struggle_web.pdf
Neo, L. C. J. (2011). Seditious in Singapore! Free speech and the offence of promoting ill-will and hostility between different racial groups. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 351–372.
Public Prosecutor v. Koh Song Huat Benjamin. (2005). SGDC 272.
Public Prosecutor v. Ong Kian Cheong. (2009). SGDC 163.
Shahid, O., & Ali, T. (2013). Meet the controversial cleric threatening to turn UK Muslims against each other. VICE. http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/meet-the-controversial-shia-cleric-bringing-sectarian-tension-to-the-uk
The Straits Times. (2015, October 15). Dawoodi Bohra members who contributed to Singapore society. http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/dawoodi-bohra-members-who-contributed-to-singapore-society
Thio, L. (2009). Between Eden and Armageddon: Navigating religion and politics in Singapore. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 365–405.
Thio, L., & Tan, K. Y. L. (1997). Appendix D: 1966 Constitutional Commission Report. Dalam Constitutional law in Malaysia and Singapore. Butterworths Asia.
Welch, S. (2013). The theory of political culture (p. 203). Oxford University Press.
Wakaf.sg. (n.d.). MUIS: Wakaf. https://www.wakaf.sg/About/Admin-Management-of-Wakaf-by-Muis.html

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Syed Huzaifah Bin Othman Alkaff S. dan Muhammad Haziq Bin Jani