Smoking Outcome Expectancy: Pengetahuan, Perilaku, dan Konsekuensi dari Merokok
This study aims to see the relationship between smoking outcome expectancy and knowledge about the dangers of smoking in smokers with high, moderate, and low levels of addiction. Smoking outcome expectancy is a construct to explain the expectations a person gets from smoking behavior. This study involved 101 young adult smokers as respondents. Smoking outcome expectancy is measured by the SCQ-A (Smoking Consequences Questionnaire for Adults) measuring instrument compiled by Copeland, et al. (1995) adapted by Jeffries, et al. (2004). Knowledge about the dangers of smoking is measured by general knowledge of smoking compiled by Martini and Sulistyowati (2005). The measuring tool for categorizing the level of smoking dependence is the FTND (Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence) developed by Fagerstro¨m, et al. (1992). This study uses a correlational research design with the pearson correlation statistical processing method. There are two main results from this study. First, there is a non-significant relationship between positive smoking outcome expectancy and knowledge about the dangers of smoking in young adult smokers. Second, there is a significant relationship between the negative smoking outcome expectancy and knowledge about the dangers of smoking in young adult smokers. It is possible that knowledge about the dangers of smoking is not a major predictor of smoking behavior and the smoking outcome expectancy. For people who smoke with a high level of dependence, knowledge does not affect their behavior. Smoking behavior is expected to be a coping stress or physiological mechanism that the body needs.
Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. 1999. A sociocognitive analysis of substance abuse: An agentic perspective. Psychological Science, 10, 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00138
Brandon, T. H., dan Baker, T. B. 1991. The smoking consequences questionnaire: The subjective expected utility of smoking in college students. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3(3), 484–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-35184.108.40.2064
Conner, M., dan Norman, P. 1996. The role of social cognition in health behaviour. Dalam M. Connner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting Health Behaviour (hal. 1-22). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Copeland, A. L., Brandon, T. H., dan Quinn, E. P. 1995. The smoking consequences questionnaire-adult: Measurement of smoking outcome expectancies of experienced smokers. Psychological Assessment, 7(4), 484–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-35220.127.116.114
Donovan, J. E., Jessor, R., dan Costa, F. M. 1988. Syndrome of problem behavior in adolescence: A replication. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(5), 762–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.5.762
Fagerstro¨m, K. O., Heatherton, T. F., dan Kozlowski, L. T. 1992. Nicotine addiction and its assessment. Ear, Nose, and Throat Journal, 69, 763-767.
Goldman, M. S. 2002. Expectancy and risk for alcoholism: The unfortunate exploitation of a fundamental characteristic of neurobehavioral adaptation. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 26(5), 737–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2002.tb02599.x
Goldman, M. S., Del Boca, F. K., dan Darkes, J. 1999. Alcohol expectancy theory: The application of cognitive neuroscience. Dalam K. E. Leonard & H.T. Blane (Eds.), Psychological Theories of Drinking and Alcoholism (2nd ed.) (hal. 203-246). New York: Guildford Press.
Grinder, R. E. 1978. Adolescence (2nd ed.). Canada: John Willey & Sons, Inc.
Jeffries, S. K., dkk. 2004. Use of a Brief Smoking Consequences Questionnaire for Adults (SCQ-A) in African American Smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(1), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.18.1.74
Kaplan, R. M., Sallis, J. J. F., dan Ratterson. 1993. Health and Human Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Martíni, S., & Sulistyowati, M. 2005. The determinants of smoking behavior among teenagers in East Java Province, Indonesia. The Economic Tobbaco Control. Washington DC: The World Bank.
Papalia, D. E., Olds, S. W., & Feldman, R. D. 2009. Human Development 11th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Petraitis, J., Flay, B. R., & Miller, T. 1995. Reviewing theories of adolescent substance use: Organising pieces in the puzzle. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 67-86. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.67
Pollay, R. W. 2000. How Cigarette Advertising Works: Rich Imagery and Poor Information. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
Reig-Ferrer, A., dan Cepeda-Benito, A. 2007. Smoking expectancies in smokers and never smokers: An examination of the smoking Consequences Questionnaire—Spanish. Addictive Behaviors, 32(7), 1405-1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.10.004
Rice, F. P. 1990. The Adolescence (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Sarafino, E. P. 1990. Health Psychology: Biopsychosocial Interaction. United States of America: John Willey & Sons, Inc.