Decision Support Systems for Determining the Best Santri at PPTQ Al Kaukab using Simple Additive Weighting Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47776/nuai.v1i1.1590Keywords:
DSS, SAW, Santri, PesantrenAbstract
A Decision Support System (DSS) is a tool developed to aid in making decisions that are more accurate, efficient, and well-organized, particularly when assessing several options using multiple criteria. This research designed a Decision Support System (DSS) utilizing the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method to identify the top-performing santri at PPTQ Al Kaukab. The purpose of the system is to enhance educational quality by objectively selecting exceptional students for acknowledgment. The assessment was based on seven weighted criteria, including attitude, attendance, academic performance, and rule violations. Data were collected from seven selected santri, and each was scored and normalized before being processed using the SAW method. The final ranking showed that A3 (Muhda Lutfa Azizah) achieved the highest score of 0.803, followed by A1 (Unifah) with 0.791, and A5 (Tasa) with 0.686. These results indicate that the SAW method is effective in delivering accurate, fair, and transparent recommendations, making it a reliable approach for structured decision-making in pesantren environments.
References
[1] A. Ahmad and Y. I. Kurniawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pegawai Terbaik Menggunakan Simple Additive Weighting,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 101–108, 2020, doi: 10.20884/1.jutif.2020.1.2.14.
[2] J. H. Y. S. Wan Mariatul Kifti, “Analisis Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Produk Terlaris dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” Swabumi, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 77–87, 2022, doi: 10.31294/swabumi.v10i1.12226.
[3] G. Lestari and A. Savitri Puspaningrum, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Tunjangan Karyawan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Studi Kasus: Pt Mutiara Ferindo Internusa,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 38–48, 2021.
[4] N. Tri Romadhona et al., “Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan Melalui Bimbingan Belajar,” J. Community Serv. Engagem., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 18–23, 2022.
[5] R. Taufiq, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Edisi Pert. Jakarta: Penerbit Mitra Wacana Media, 2020.
[6] T. H. Salsabila, T. M. Indrawati, and R. A. Fitrie, “Meningkatkan Efisiensi Pengambilan Keputusan Publik melalui Kecerdasan Buatan,” J. Internet Softw. Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 21, 2024, doi: 10.47134/pjise.v1i2.2401.
[7] B. Hendrik, T. Informatika, U. Putra, I. Upi, and Y. Padang, “Review Metode Sistem Pendukung Keputusan ( SPK ) Terbaik untuk Seleksi Proposal Penelitian : Evaluasi Berdasarkan Kriteria Efektivitas dan Akurasi,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 0738, no. 4, pp. 6456–6462, 2024.
[8] D. Pasha, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Jasa Travel Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory,” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 70–77, 2024, doi: 10.58602/jics.v2i2.23.
[9] M. A. Al-Marom and S. Wibisono, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Rekomendasi Kelulusan dan Pemeringkatan Santri Menggunakan Metode AHP-TOPSIS,” J. Ilm. Media Sisfo, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 49–59, 2021, doi: 10.33998/mediasisfo.2021.15.1.998.
[10] A. Zumarniansyah, R. Ardianto, Y. Alkhalifi, and Q. Nur Azizah, “Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Karyawan Terbaik Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 75–81, 2021, doi: 10.51998/jsi.v10i2.419.
[11] I. Ali, V. Gunawan, and K. Adi, “Land-use suitability evaluation for organic rice cultivation using fuzzy-AHP ELECTRE method,” Regist. J. Ilm. Teknol. Sist. Inf., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.26594/register.v7i1.2080.
[12] I. Kurnia, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Siswa Terbaik Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode Ahp Dan Saw,” JIKO (Jurnal Inform. dan Komputer), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 164–172, 2021, doi: 10.33387/jiko.v4i3.3339.
[13] J. Prasetiana, Ravie K. Laday, and Satria, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Santri Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weigthing (Saw) Pondok Pesantren Al - Washilah,” ISTA Online Technol. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 46–55, 2024, doi: 10.62702/ion.v5i1.106.
[14] D. M. El Faritsi, D. Saripurna, and I. Mariami, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Tenaga Pengajar Menggunakan Metode MOORA,” J. Sist. Inf. Triguna Dharma (JURSI TGD), vol. 1, no. 4, p. 239, 2022, doi: 10.53513/jursi.v1i4.4948.
[15] C. T. Surya Wigatil, S. Ipnuwati, and K. Zuhri, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Santri Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode SAW (Studi Kasus : Pondok Pesantren Al-Ma’ruf Lampung),” J. Teknol. dan Inform., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.57084/jeda.v3i1.992.
[16] I. Ismayadi, A. A. Samudra, and S. Junaidi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Di SMA Negeri 1 Siberut Selatan,” J. Inform. Kaputama, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 137–149, 2022, doi: 10.59697/jik.v6i2.112.
[17] A. A. Hulu, M. Mesran, and J. H. Lubis, “Penerapan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) Dalam Menentukan Juara Perlombaan Vocal Group,” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 657–662, 2022, doi: 10.47065/tin.v2i11.1501.
[18] D. A. Fernando, Hartatiana, and F. Ismail, “Pentingnya Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrument Evaluasi Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam,” J. Tarb. Islam., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 64–73, 2023.
[19] Y. Rahayaan and A. S. Purnomo, “Analisis Penentuan Kualitas Pengajaran Guru Dengan Pendekatan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 203–210, 2024.
[20] V. M. Wulandari, N. Latifah, and S. Muzid, “Metode Penerapan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Pada Aplikasi Seleksi Peserta Program Kecakapan Wirausaha (PKW) Pada Lembaga Kursus dan Pelatihan (LKP) Harmoni,” J. Softw. Eng. Ampera, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2023, doi: 10.51519/journalsea.v4i1.376.
[21] B. Haqi and J. Sinaga, “Pemilihan Pegawai Terbaik Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Menggunakan Framework Bootstrap (Studi Kasus : Pt Bas),” J. Math. Technol., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 241–248, 2023.
[22] M. N. Sutoyo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Seleksi Produk Unggulan UMKM dengan Metode MADM Model Yager,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2025, doi: 10.31284/p.semtik.2025-1.7144.
[23] Darsin and D. Triyana, “Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” vol. 9, pp. 79–87, 2021.
[24] A. Sulistiyawati, “Penerapan Metode MOORA dan LOPCOW Dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Guru Bimbel,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 197–208, 2024.
[25] H. Saragih and A. M. Harahap, “Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Donasi Sembako Panti Asuhan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” vol. 5, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.30865/klik.v5i1.2087.
[26] R. H. M. Napitupulu, C. Handayani, and H. Haryati, “Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Untuk Menentukan Karyawan Outsourching Terbaik Di PT Bank BNI Cabang Cirebon,” Bina Insa. Ict J., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 166, 2021, doi: 10.51211/biict.v8i2.1584.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 I Putu Deny Arthawan Sugih Prabowo, Hana Mufidianingsih, Mohammad Reza Fahlevi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
