Sentiment Analysis of Emotional Intensity as a Continuous Driver of Engagement and Algorithmic Visibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47776/nuai.v2i1.2006Keywords:
Sentiment analysis, Emotional intensity, Algorithmic visibility, Social media engagement, Digital political discourseAbstract
This study investigates how emotional intensity, rather than sentiment direction, shapes engagement and algorithmic visibility in digital political discourse. Using sentiment analysis, a dataset of about 15,000 posts from Twitter (X) and YouTube was collected over a 30-day period and scored with a hybrid TextBlob, VADER, and BERT pipeline. Emotional strength (the absolute sentiment value) correlated moderately with engagement (r = 0.58, p < 0.05), whereas the directional sentiment score did not (r ≈ 0.05). Emotionally intense posts attracted about 2.4 times more engagement than neutral posts, and positive posts were the most frequent (41%) while neutral posts drew the lowest mean engagement. These results indicate that engagement-based ranking amplifies emotional magnitude over neutral or analytical content, which can narrow the diversity of visible expression. The findings give platform designers and policymakers a reproducible basis for assessing how affective dynamics shape visibility in algorithmically mediated public discourse.
References
[1] S. Gearhart, B. Zhang, and O. Adegbola, “Tweeting, talking, or doing politics? Testing the influence of communication on democratic engagement,” Telemat. Informatics Reports, vol. 16, p. 100167, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100167.
[2] T. Gillespie, Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. 2018. doi: 10.12987/9780300235029.
[3] P. Bouchaud, “Algorithmic Amplification of Politics and Engagement Maximization on Social Media,” 2024, pp. 131–142. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-53503-1_11.
[4] M. Subramanian, S. Veerappampalayam Easwaramoorthy, G. Deepalakshmi, J. Cho, and G. Manikandan, “A survey on hate speech detection and sentiment analysis using machine learning and deep learning models,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 80, pp. 110–121, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.038.
[5] B. Pang and L. Lee, “Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis,” Found. Trends Inf. Retr., vol. 2, pp. 1–135, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1561/1500000011.
[6] W. Aljedaani et al., “Sentiment analysis on Twitter data integrating TextBlob and deep learning models: The case of US airline industry,” Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 255, p. 109780, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109780.
[7] K. Barik and S. Misra, “Analysis of customer reviews with an improved VADER lexicon classifier,” J. Big Data, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 10, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40537-023-00861-x.
[8] T. Islam et al., “Lexicon and Deep Learning-Based Approaches in Sentiment Analysis on Short Texts,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 12, pp. 11–34, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.4236/jcc.2024.121002.
[9] F. Alkomah and X. Ma, “A Literature Review of Textual Hate Speech Detection Methods and Datasets,” Information, vol. 13, p. 273, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13060273.
[10] T. Garg, S. Masud, T. Suresh, and T. Chakraborty, “Handling Bias in Toxic Speech Detection: A Survey,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 55, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3580494.
[11] A. Albladi et al., “Hate Speech Detection Using Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Review,” IEEE Access, vol. PP, p. 1, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3532397.
[12] J. Berger and K. Milkman, “Emotion and Virality: What Makes Online Content Go Viral?,” GfK Mark. Intell. Rev., vol. 5, pp. 18–23, May 2013, doi: 10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0022.
[13] S. Stieglitz and L. Dang-Xuan, “Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media—Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 217–248, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408.
[14] W. J. Brady, J. A. Wills, J. T. Jost, J. A. Tucker, and J. J. Van Bavel, “Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 114, no. 28, pp. 7313–7318, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618923114.
[15] S. Milli, M. Carroll, Y. Wang, S. Pandey, S. Zhao, and A. Dragan, “Engagement, user satisfaction, and the amplification of divisive content on social media,” PNAS Nexus, vol. 4, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf062.
[16] S. Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Profile Books, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=bYL9xAEACAAJ
[17] M. Haim, A. Graefe, and H.-B. Brosius, “Burst of the Filter Bubble?: Effects of personalization on the diversity of Google News,” Digit. Journal., vol. 6, pp. 330–343, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145.
[18] J. Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1991.
[19] K. L. Keung, C. K. M. Lee, and K.-T. Luk, “Determinants of Behavioral Intention in Augmented Reality Filter Adoption: An Integrated TAM and Satisfaction–Loyalty Model Approach,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 20, no. 3. p. 186, 2025. doi: 10.3390/jtaer20030186.
[20] P. Nandwani and R. Verma, “A review on sentiment analysis and emotion detection from text,” Soc. Netw. Anal. Min., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 81, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13278-021-00776-6.
[21] C. J. Hutto and E. Gilbert, VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. 2015.
[22] J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,” in NAACL-HLT, Oct. 2019, pp. 4171–4186. doi: 10.18653/v1/N19-1423.
[23] J. Zhao, K. Liu, and L. Xu, “Sentiment Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions,” Comput. Linguist., vol. 42, pp. 595–598, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1162/COLI_r_00259.
[24] A. Aljabar, I. Ali, and B. M. Karomah, “Sentiment Analysis Using Transformer Method,” J. Informatics Inf. Syst. Softw. Eng. Appl., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 90–97, 2024, doi: 10.20895/inista.v6i2.1383.
[25] Z. Waseem and D. Hovy, Hateful Symbols or Hateful People? Predictive Features for Hate Speech Detection on Twitter. 2016. doi: 10.18653/v1/N16-2013.
[26] S. Mohammad and P. Turney, “Crowdsourcing a Word-Emotion Association Lexicon,” Comput. Intell., vol. 29, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.x.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zia Ul Rehman Zafar, Dedi Gunawan, Muhammad Saif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Published by Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
